You remain responsible
Attorney approval applies to the exact version you reviewed. No DOCX for filing is issued until that version is approved.
On your infrastructure. With local or hosted AI inference.
A clamping device for a forging workpiece with a base body and a clamping arm, wherein the clamping arm pivots on a joint AI and a sensor coil detects the clamping force without contact AI, characterised in that the evaluation unit generates a signal when a deviation occurs AI.
Fictional example showing how AI-generated and attorney-reviewed passages are marked.
3 AI-formulated passages · 0 attorney-reviewed
For patent attorneys, PatentSchmiede makes responsibility in the draft traceable. That includes clear sign-off, information about data processing, and source details for each section.
Attorney approval applies to the exact version you reviewed. No DOCX for filing is issued until that version is approved.
The installation runs on your firm’s infrastructure. Model A has no external inference endpoint configured, and the supplied local model server, Ollama, refuses models that run in the Ollama cloud. A separately configured hosted fallback can still send data outside if the local model fails. In Model B, prompts and embedding text are sent to the Azure endpoint configured by your firm. Web research in the research record is on by default. Words from the research order go to a public search engine only in a research run for which the attorney explicitly allows web access. Your IT team can switch web research off.
The draft shows its version, the model and prompt version used, and the sources it draws on.
01 / 05
You manage the case file. The copilot checks, asks, and drafts. Versions and decisions remain traceable at each step.
You open the case file and record the technical invention as its starting point.
The copilot marks missing information before drafting begins.
You answer prioritised questions. The answers are linked to the invention disclosure.
The copilot writes claims, description, and abstract and checks them for formal requirements.
You compare changes and restore an earlier state as a new version.
You review and approve a specific version.
After you approve the version, the system creates a DOCX file.
02 / 05
The workflow makes it clear which statements are supported, checked, and approved.
03 / 05
The application and case files run on your firm's infrastructure. Your firm chooses between local AI processing and its configured Azure endpoint.
04 / 05
No prior-art search, no novelty opinion, no freedom-to-operate search, and no legal advice. A patent attorney must review every draft.
05 / 05
We are looking for firms to test the workflow with real invention disclosures and shape it with us.